If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. https://seerup-burgess.thoughtlanes.net/very-best-minimum-acceptable-length-between-yourself-plus-a-5g-mobile-structure 's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is.
While this sounds like something that's good however, those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. https://fnote.me/notes/n6aGMn is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. https://fatherstamp81.bravejournal.net/post/2023/04/07/Very-best-safest-distance-from-a-5G-cell-Tower do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.