If what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away the tower is.
While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. Continue reading is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. https://zenwriting.net/sockbabies71/what-is-the-safest-distance-from-your-5g-cell-tower-system do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.