Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
https://anotepad.com/notes/hd2ptq7b  is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
safe distance from cell tower

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.

Although this may sound like something that's good however, people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those living further distance from them.

But, the study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds



The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore,  safe distance from cell tower  should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.